Legal Opinion
Hayuk v. Hallook
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEugene F. Sullivan, J.
The defendant, appearing specially in each of the above three actions, moves for an order to vacate and to set aside the services of the summonses upon the defendant, which were made pursuant to section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
The causes of action are for personal injuries sustained by each of the plaintiffs, for property damage sustained by one of them to his automobile and for damages sustained by another for loss of services of, and medical expenses for, his wife.
The three causes of action arose out of a collision between an automobile which was owned and operated by plaintiff,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Henderson v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Muslusky v. . Lehigh Valley Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Braman v. BramanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Citizens Trust Co. v. R. Prescott & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Stewart v. Transcontinental Car Forwarding Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Deeb v. BerriMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- McGowan v. BellangerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Kohler v. DerderianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Albrecht v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Harper v. CathertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.