Strada v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California; Benjamin F. Bledsoe, Judge. • Louis Strada was convicted’ of maintaining a common nuisance, under the National Prohibition Act, and brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, District Judge.
Plaintiff in error was convicted of maintaining a common nuisance, as defined by section 21 of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 314), in that from ahout October 8, 1920, to November 8, 1920, as was .charged’, he carried on the Flora D’ltalia restaurant, in San Diego, California, “where intoxicating liquors, to wit, wine and whisky, containing alcohol in excess of one-half of 1 per cent, by volume,” were kept and sold, in violation of the act.
[1,2] It was not error to receive evidence of sales of wine at the restaurant a few days prior to October 8th. It will be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lewinsohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. KallasUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Belvin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Hensberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- McDonnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
- United States v. McGuireDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1924
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.