Legal Opinion
Furlong v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1926No. 6872PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMIDON, District Judge.
Defendant was indicted for violating the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § KDBS^ et seq.), the first three counts charging unlawful sales, and the fourth the maintenance of a nuisance. These violations are charged as second offenses. The indictment sets out fully the information in the first prosecution charging in seven counts the unlawful sale of liquor, and in the ninth count the maintenance of a nuisance. The indictment also alleges the proceedings of the court under this information. It states that the defendant pleaded guilty to all of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Holker v. HennesseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Ex parte HurnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. PollerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- United States v. George Ludwig DornblutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Lindsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.