Legal Opinion
Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. Bullock
Texas Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1978No. B-7427PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHADICK, Justice.
Petitioner, Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, instituted suit as authorized by Tex.Tax.-Gen.Ann. art. 20.10(H)(1) (1969), 1 against respondent, Robert D. Bullock, in his capacity as Comptroller of Public Accounts of Texas, for recovery of judgment refunding sales and use taxes alleged to have been illegally determined and collected by Bullock.
Along with its primary business of selling automobile tires, Firestone installed shock absorbers in customer automobiles on a lump-sum price basis which included the price of the parts and the price of the labor. As a result of such…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hagerty v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Doby v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Utah Hotel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- Cody v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rylander v. Fisher Controls International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Southwest Royalties, Inc. v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Denton County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Chappell Hill Bank v. Lane Bank Equipment Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
- Insurance Co. of State of the Pennsylvania v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.