Forler v. Williams

The bill was dismissed. Plaintiff has appealed. Facts are stated in Forler v. Williams, 242 Mich. 639, and in Williams v. Richards, 250 Mich. 165.

Plaintiff by this bill seeks accounting of defendant, a tenant in common with Mm, for use and occupation of land. Tliis bill states no case indicating liability to account-. It alleges no ouster, no promise to pay, notMng to indicate that defendant occupied other than as of right as a tenant in common. Everts v. Beach, 31 Mich. 136 (18 Am. Rep. 169); Davis v. Filer, 40 Mich. 310.

Accounting was pleaded and tendered, but it was disregarded by…