Legal Opinion

Williams v. Richards

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1930No. Docket No. 127, Calendar No. 34,805PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants own as tenants in common a house and lot in Detroit. Defendants, contending that plaintiff, Thomas Williams, had agreed orally with them to purchase their respective interests and to pay them each therefor $2,500, sought specific performance of the alleged oral agreement, which was refused by decree of the Wayne circuit and the decree on appeal was affirmed here. Forler v. Williams, 242 Mich. 639. In the case at bar plaintiffs seek partition and defendants present again their demand for specific performance of the alleged oral agreement. The trial court granted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forler v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mode, Ltd. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Spare v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Giambalvo v. Phoenix InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1942
  4. First Christian Church v. Hartford Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  5. Fire Ass'n v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API