Legal Opinion
B & G Enterprises, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 4, 1999No. 98-598 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HODGES, Judge.
This case is before the court on cross motions for partial summary judgment.1 Plaintiff claims that a California law effectively banning the use of cigarette vending machines in all but certain specified locations is attributable to the Federal Government, and that this constitutes a Fifth Amendment taking. Defendant contends that the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant Program does not create a taking merely because the Government conditioned receipt of the grant on the states’ meeting certain minimum criteria approved by the Secretary of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Henry Hendler, Paul Garrett, Tillie Goldring, as Trustees, and Henry Hendler and Irving Gronsky v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- D. R. Smalley & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- B & G Enterprises, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- A-1 Cigarette Vending, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- A-1 Amusement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- B & G Enterprises, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.