Legal Opinion
Puro International of New Jersey Corp. v. California Union Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 29, 1987No. 84 Civ. 8054 (PKL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
The matters now before the Court in this case comprise a series of motions and cross-motions for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Puro International of New Jersey Corp. (“Puro”), a processor of down and feathers and a dealer in finished down products, has sued California Union Insurance Co. (“Cal Union”), the insurer of that part of Puro’s property that was damaged while stored in a leased warehouse, and Genatt Associates, Inc. (“Genatt”), the broker of the insurance policy. Cal Union has brought a third party…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Time Incorporated v. Bernard Geis AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1989
- Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Americold Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993