Rico v. Brandenstein
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
The action was brought for a partition of the southeast two-thirds of the Rancho San Barnard!no, situate in the county of Monterey. The two plaintiffs claim to be the owners of an undivided one-eighth, each as tenants in common, with defendants Brandenstein and Godchaux, who are averred to be each the owner of an undivided three-eighths in said rancho. The answer denies the ownership of plaintiffs, or that they were ever tenants in common with defendants, and avers ownership in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- White v. . WagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Wells v. CaywoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
- Sims v. RicketsIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Dow v. Gould & Curry Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1867
- Burdeno v. AmperseMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mullins v. ShrewsburyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Alexander v. ShalalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Mammoth City v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1926
- Atwell v. GordonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923