Legal Opinion

Maluccio v. E. Lyme Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 18, 2017No. AC38680PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPellegrino, J.

This appeal is brought by the defendant, the East Lyme Zoning Board of Appeals (board), from a decision of the trial court sustaining an appeal from the board's decision denying a building permit for a parcel of land owned by the plaintiff, Fortunata Maluccio, that was designated as a "recreation area" on an original subdivision plan. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly found that the designation of the parcel as a "recreation area" did not preclude the development of that parcel for residential use. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Langer v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Moscowitz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Wing v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Roraback v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Watson v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API