Legal Opinion

Alaska Airlines v. Oszman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1950No. 12231PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant asks reversal of a money judgment against it because two of its proposed instructions were not given to the jury. Appellant’s sole defense to the action is that the alleged indebtedness never existed. The rejected instructions were intended to point up appellant’s claim that there were such unreasonable delays on the part of appellee in making demands and in bringing suit for the sum of various amounts of money allegedly expended by appellee at appellant’s request and for his benefit, that the jury should take note of them and the circumstances in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Paddock v. MasonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  3. Shadock v. Alpine Plank-road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Greenleaf v. BirthSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  5. United States v. MessingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. United States v. Henry Bessesen and Buni BessesenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. Chicago & North Western Railway Company v. Arthur J. RiegerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  4. Felicita Fernandez, Administratrix v. Robert D. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Felicita Fernandez, Administratrix v. Robert D. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API