Legal Opinion

Mercantile National Bank of Chicago v. Quest, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 5, 1969No. Civ. 3571PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GRANT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, as patentees and licensees, under United States Letters Patent No. 3,115,138, bring this action for injunction and damages for infringement * against the manufacturing defendant, Quest, Inc., (Quest) and Paul E. Magers (Magers), its President and Chief Executive Officer. Plaintiffs charged that defendants’ infringement was willful and deliberate and seek treble damages.

By their answer, defendants denied the charge of infringement, alleged invalidity of plaintiffs’ patent, and denied enforceability by reason of alleged misuse. Defendants also…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Xerox Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  2. Petitioning Creditors of Melon Produce, Inc. v. Joseph Braunstein, Trustee, Melon Produce, Inc. v. Peter KargerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. San Francisco Seals, Ltd. v. National Hockey LeagueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1974
  4. Swettlen v. Wagoner Gas and Oil, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Gardner v. Awards Marketing Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API