Jacobsen v. Van Syckel
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The appellees, Van Syckel and Ahl, sued appellant to recover damages in title sum of $900, alleging that they purchased from defendant 3,000 pounds of No. 2 butter for $900, which was represented to be marketable and fit for human consumption, and that the butter delivered under the contract of sale was not No. 2 butter, was unmarketable, unfit for human consumption, and worthless. From a verdict and judgment in the sum of $300.90 the defendant appeals.
1. While the evidence is not wholly satisfactory it is sufficient to sustain the verdict. This court would not be warranted in setting aside…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ellerd v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Crosby v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Farrand v. Houston T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- McIntosh v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Twichell v. KlinkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. MoserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Moore v. OrgainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Stockwell v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932