Legal Opinion

Jacobsen v. Van Syckel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1923No. 1408PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The appellees, Van Syckel and Ahl, sued appellant to recover damages in title sum of $900, alleging that they purchased from defendant 3,000 pounds of No. 2 butter for $900, which was represented to be marketable and fit for human consumption, and that the butter delivered under the contract of sale was not No. 2 butter, was unmarketable, unfit for human consumption, and worthless. From a verdict and judgment in the sum of $300.90 the defendant appeals.

1. While the evidence is not wholly satisfactory it is sufficient to sustain the verdict. This court would not be warranted in setting aside…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellerd v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Crosby v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Farrand v. Houston T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. McIntosh v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Twichell v. KlinkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. MoserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Moore v. OrgainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Stockwell v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API