Legal Opinion

Farrand v. Houston T. C. R. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1918No. 7609PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Harris County; Henry J. Dannenbaum, Judge. Suit by Wallace Farrand, by next friend, W. W. Farrand, against the Houston & Texas Central Railroad Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This admittedly correct statement of the nature and result of the suit, very slightly changed, is taken from plaintiff in error’s brief:

“Wallace Farrand, a minor, by his father, W. W. Farrand, as his next friend, sued the Houston & Texas Central Railroad Company to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him, including the loss of his eye, when he lacked one and a half months of being 13 years of age, from the explosion of a dynamite cap that the defendant, it was alleged, had negligently left exposed in an unlocked locker on its premises, which had been made unusually attractive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Trinity & B. v. Ry. Co. v. GearyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. MillerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Taylor v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. ContoisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Hudson v. West Central Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API