Legal Opinion
Swarthmore Junior, Inc. v. Miss Greeley Junior Frocks, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 25, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
This is a motion by the plaintiff with respect to the conduct of a pending examination before trial of an officer of the defendant. In the course of the examination, the witness refused to answér various questions propounded by counsel for the plaintiff, and the motion is for rulings on these questions, as well as for the production of books and records.
The action is at law for damages for alleged infringement of a design patent for a lady’s dress, issued February 9, 1943, and there is a demand for a jury trial.
The complaint alleges that the defendant has infringed by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Nat Lewis Purses, Inc. v. Carole Bags, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Neufeld-Furst & Co. v. Jay-Day Frocks Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- White v. Leanore Frocks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Catalina Lighting, Inc., and Home Depot Usa, Inc., Third Party v. Lamps Plus, Inc. And Pacific Coast Lighting, Defendants/third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Lundberg v. WellesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Ross v. Plastic Playthings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956