Legal Opinion

Ter Haar v. Steele

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1951No. Docket 72, Calendar 45,014PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

Earl Ter Haar, plaintiff, was seriously injured when the panel truck in which he was riding-collided with a truck owned by James Steele, defendant. The case was submitted to a jury who found no cause of action. A motion for a new trial was denied and Ter Plaar has taken this appeal.

On October 8, 1948, at about 8 o’clock in the evening, after dark, Ter Haar was riding in his truck, driven by Bichard Underhill, his employee. The collision occurred about 2-¿ miles west of St. Louis, Michigan, while they were driving west on M-46,- a 2-lane highway. They had been working in Hemlock, Michigan, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Smiley v. Arrow Spring Bed Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Thompson v. Southern Michigan Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Buchel v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Company v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. HoxieMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. CasterSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  4. Nagele-Kelly Manufacturing Co. v. HannakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Board of County Road Commissioners of MontcalmDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API