Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Matter of Matthews, 9-07-28 (1-28-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 2008No. Nos. 9-07-28, 9-07-29, 9-07-34PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

A. Facts Procedural Posture

{¶ 1} Father-appellant, James Lawson (hereinafter "Lawson"), and mother-appellant, Menyon Matthews (hereinafter "Matthews"), appeal the judgment of the Marion County Court of Common Pleas granting the Marion County Children's Services Board's (hereinafter "CSB") motion for permanent custody of Thomas and Timothy Matthews (hereinafter "Tommy" and "Timothy"). Matthews also appeals the trial court's termination of her parental rights with respect to her daughter, Mersaydeez Hall (hereinafter "Mersaydeez"). For reasons that follow, we affirm in Matthews' appeal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lillie v. MeachemOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. In re D.K.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. In re R.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API