Legal Opinion
Blake ex rel. McPherren v. Continental Casualty Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 24, 1934No. Gen. No. 37,696PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matohett
In a suit by Blake for the use of the McPherrens and upon trial by the court there was a finding for plaintiff in the sum of $2,469.55, with judgment thereon, which defendant asks us to reverse.
The statement of claim discloses that the suit is based upon an automobile liability insurance contract issued by defendant insurance company to plaintiff Blake. The evidence shows that while the policy was in force, Blake, driving an automobile in California, collided with another automobile which was driven by Mr. McPherren and in which Mrs. McPherren also was riding.
Separate actions in case were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Goodrich v. TenneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- American Automobile Insurance v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Koontz v. General Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- U-Drive-It Car Co. v. FreidmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Van Vleck v. BarbeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Charter Oak Fire Insurance v. Interstate Mechanical, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Cohen v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1960
- Illinois State Bar Association Mutual Insurance Company v. Frank M. Greenfield and Associates, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012