Legal Opinion

State v. Grundler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1959No. 151PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.

This is the determinative question on this appeal: Did the Judge below err in dismissing application of defendant, appellant, on the ground that he had no jurisdiction or authority un der G.S. 1-220 to hear the motion? The Court is of opinion and holds that the ruling is erroneous.

In this State it is provided by statute G.S. 15-180 that “in all cases of conviction in the Superior Court for any criminal offense, the defendant shall have the right to appeal * *; and the appeal shall be perfected and the case for the Supreme Court settled, as provided, in civil action.”

And the General Assembly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. State v. . FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Tickle v. . HobgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Robert J. Grundler and Joseph L. Jelly v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  2. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Blitz v. Agean, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API