State v. Grundler
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.
This is the determinative question on this appeal: Did the Judge below err in dismissing application of defendant, appellant, on the ground that he had no jurisdiction or authority un der G.S. 1-220 to hear the motion? The Court is of opinion and holds that the ruling is erroneous.
In this State it is provided by statute G.S. 15-180 that “in all cases of conviction in the Superior Court for any criminal offense, the defendant shall have the right to appeal * *; and the appeal shall be perfected and the case for the Supreme Court settled, as provided, in civil action.”
And the General Assembly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. . FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Tickle v. . HobgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Robert J. Grundler and Joseph L. Jelly v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Blitz v. Agean, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.