Legal Opinion
Corrigan v. Clairol, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 22, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 4882PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This is an action by a Massachusetts resident against the defendant, a Connecticut corporation, to recover for personal injuries allegedly incurred as a result of plaintiff’s use in Massachusetts as a beautician of one of defendant’s hair-bleach products in the course of business. The action was brought within the two-year limitation period established by Massachusetts law for personal injury actions but well after the one-year period for such actions in Connecticut. Conn.Gen.Sta'ts., Rev. of 1949, Sec. 8324. Defendant moves to dismiss on the ground that.the action is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Thomas Iron Co. v. Ensign-Bickford Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- McMillen v. Douglas Aircraft Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brownell Combs, Ii, Administrator C.T.A. Of the Estate of Leslie Combs, Ii, Deceased v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Miller v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Bealle v. Nyden's, IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
- Combs v. Intl Ins CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Steriti v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1966