Legal Opinion
Miller v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 1978No. 12321PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action as barred by Idaho’s borrowing statute, I.C. § 5-239, which applies the California statute of limitations. The judgment is affirmed.
Appellant Carl L. Miller was an Oregon resident employed as a truck driver at the time he was allegedly injured by employees of respondent Stauffer Chemical who were loading his truck at a California fertilizer plant. More than a year later and after California’s one-year statute of limitation 1 on negligence actions had run, appellant moved from Oregon to Idaho without having filed suit in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. GuestSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Township of WillingboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brownell Combs, Ii, Administrator C.T.A. Of the Estate of Leslie Combs, Ii, Deceased v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville Hillary Rodham Clinton Little, Brown & Co. George StephanopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- McCann v. Foster Wheeler LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Miller v. LockettIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Ehlco Liquidating TrustAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.