Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Wolson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1978No. 821PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the court below erred in refusing to grant her a new trial because the trial judge erroneously: (1) charged the jury that she (plaintiff below) might be found contributorily negligent, (2) charged that appellee (defendant below) might be excused from liability because of a sudden emergency, and (3) failed to charge that the defendant could be found guilty of reckless and wanton misconduct. We agree with the first two of these contentions, and therefore remand the case for a new trial.

This lawsuit grows out of a series of three collisions all occurring…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Wisniewski v. GREAT A. & P. TEA. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Unangst v. WhitehouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Wisniewski v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Fugagli v. CamasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Lockhart v. ListSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. McKEE BY McKEE v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Elder v. OrluckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Angelo v. DiamontoniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API