Wisniewski v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jacobs, J.,
This is an appeal from judgment against the defendant in a products liability case under Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code.1 Both the denial of judgment n.o.v. by the lower court in banc and its refusal to grant a new trial are assigned as error by the defendant on this appeal. We affirm.
“In considering a motion for judgment n.o.v., the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the verdict winner, and he must be given the benefit of every inference of fact arising therefrom, and any conflict in the evidence must be resolved in his favor.” Isaac v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Majors v. Brodhead HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Eldridge v. MelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mike v. Borough of AliquippaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Makripodis v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Cheryl Harris v. Kellogg Brown & Root ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Lux v. Gerald E. Ort Trucking, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Wisniewski v. GREAT A. & P. TEA. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.