Legal Opinion

Darnell v. Higgins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1926No. 16872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, 0.

This is an original action in the Supreme Court based upon an application for writ of certiorari. The writ was granted commanding the defendant to certify all proceedings, pertaining to an order annexing certain territory to a consolidated school district, to this court, and to appear and show cause why the order of annexation should not be set aside.

The matter is now before the court on its merits, and while numerous questions are raised, the only one necessary for this court to determine is that of whether or not cer-tiorari is the 'proper procedure, and whether or not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. State v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. The Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com'r.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Keasal v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. Darnell v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Stringer v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API