Legal Opinion

Mauldin v. Bearden

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2009No. 2008-SC-000557-DGEPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice NOBLE.

Appellants, George and Joyce Mauldin, are the paternal grandparents of O.M., who is a minor. The Appellee, Rebecca Bearden, is the birth mother of O.M. Through a series of events which will be discussed more fully hereafter, the Appellants were given permanent custody of O.M. Subsequently, Appellee moved to have that order set aside pursuant to CR 60.02(d) and (f), alleging fraud in the earlier proceedings. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, finding that the Ap-pellee had made sufficient allegations of fraud and that the trial court had improperly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McQueen v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cawood v. CawoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  3. Overstreet v. Grinstead's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Dawson v. ClellandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  5. Rice v. DowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. William Harry Meece v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Williams v. BittelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  3. Williams v. FrymireCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
  4. William Harry Meece v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API