Legal Opinion

McQueen v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1997No. 97-SC-507-MRPublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

This is an appeal from an order denying Appellant’s CR 60.02 motion for relief from the final sentence of death imposed by the Madison Circuit Court on April 8, 1981, and denying his motion for a stay of his execution now scheduled for July 1, 1997. In denying Appellant’s motions, Judge Adams found his CR 60.02 claim to be both untimely and meritless. We agree.

PURPOSE OP CIVIL RULE 60.02

The interrelationship between CR 60.02 and RCr 11.42 was carefully delineated in Gross v. Commonwealth, Ky., 648 S.W.2d 853 (1983). In a criminal case, these rules are not overlapping, but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Harold McQueen Jr. v. Gene Scroggy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Gross v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  4. McQueen v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Jacobs v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Foley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Barnett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  4. White v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000
  5. Baze v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2008

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API