Legal Opinion

In re B.B.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 2018No. 04-18-00108-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prior to obtaining a written statement from respondent, Magistrate Oliver gave respondent a warning that the respondent may remain silent and not make any statement at all and that any statement that he makes may be used in evidence against him; that respondent has the right to have an attorney present to advise respondent either prior to any questioning or during the questioning; that if respondent is unable to employ an attorney, the child has the right to have an attorney appointed to counsel with the child before or during any interviews *789with peace officers or attorneys representing the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Roquemore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Pham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of F. M. v. a Juvenile v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2025
  2. in the Matter of J.A.M., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2020
  3. the State of Texas v. Sebastian Torres, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API