Legal Opinion
Brower v. Daley
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 11, 2000No. C99-3892 TEHPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HENDERSON, District Judge.
On April 29,1999, the Secretary of Commerce issued an “initial finding” that “there is insufficient evidence that chase and encirclement by the tuna purse seine fishery ‘is having a significant adverse impact’ on the depleted dolphin stocks in the [Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean].” 64 Fed.Reg. 24,590 (1999). David Brower, Earth Island Institute, The Humane Society of the United States, and other individuals and organizations (collectively “plaintiffs”), challenge the validity of this finding under the Administrative Procedures Act…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brower v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Earth Island Institute v. HogarthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Maine v. NortonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2003
- American Wildlands v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Habitat Education Center, Inc. v. BosworthDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.