Legal Opinion
King v. Saratoga County Board of Supervisors
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 1996PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
After several years of State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) compliance measures by respondent (the Sara-toga County Board of Supervisors) in connection with establishing a County-wide landfill, appellants ask that respondent be returned to square one because of improper site selection. In the unique circumstances presented we, like the trial court and Appellate Division, refuse to order a redundant de novo environmental review.
Faced with imminent closure of 13 local municipal landfills, the County of Saratoga during the 1980’s began considering…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Chinese Staff & Workers Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- E.F.S. Ventures Corp. v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Tri-County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Town Board of QueensburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Seymour v. County of SaratogaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- MATTER OF MERSON v. McNallyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- New York City Coalition to End Lead Poisoning, Inc. v. ValloneNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Lucas v. Planning Bd. of Town of LaGrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Manzi v. Town of RiverheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Pyramid Co. v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.