Brooks v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
In the order denying plaintiff’s oral motions to continue the summary judgment hearing and to suppress the deposition of Gary Goodwin, the trial court found the plaintiff had been served with notice of the hearing and with the Goodwin deposition, as provided by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). The findings were fully supported. Plaintiff’s claim that he had witnesses available for trial, who would offer evidence of defendant’s negligence and injury to the plaintiff, is without merit. Since the plaintiff was duly served with notice, he had ample tme to make a “response with affidavits or as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Pridgen v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Blake v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Garmon v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mosely v. WAM, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Hillman v. United States Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Fitzgerald v. WolfCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- City of Winston-Salem v. Hoots Concrete Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Middleton v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.