Legal Opinion

Hallock v. Cutler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 20, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Transcript, from a justice of the peace. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Winnebago County; the Hon. J. C. Carver, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell

Appellants were manufacturers at York, Pennsylvania, of a farm implement called a potato digger. Appellee was a dealer in agricultural implements at Bockford, Illinois. Appellee ordered one potato digger of appellants and received it about June 1,1894. Then he ordered three more. He tried them in dry soil and they seemed to work well. He paid for these four. About the last of August, 1894, he ordered twelve more, which were received by him. He afterward claimed they were unmerchantable and not fit for the purpose for which they were designed, and refused to pay for them, and offered to return…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brenton v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Archdale v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Beers v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swift Co. v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Swift & Co. v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. American Tank Co. v. Revert Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Dotson v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. Murray Iron Works Co. v. DeKalb Electric Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API