Tansey v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
LAWS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs motion to strike defendant’s pleading purporting to be an offer of judgment or, in the alternative, to suspend application of Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. insofar as future costs is concerned, will be granted. Under Rule 68 the pleading filed as an offer of judgment is not a part of the record and having been filed as such in this case, it must be stricken. Nabors v. Texas Co., D.C.W.D.La., 32 F.Supp. 91. As to future costs, defendant’s offer of judgment does not specify a definite sum to be entered as judgment which plaintiff can…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gourley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
- Nabors v. Texas Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
- L N. R. R. Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
3Cited by13 opinions
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ratner v. ArringtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Davis v. ChismAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Universal Airline, Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Greenwood v. StevensonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.