Gourley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Friend
delivered the opinion of the court.
Arthur F. Gourley, plaintiff, brought suit to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between two railroad trains at Marion, Illinois. After the jury had returned a verdict in his favor for $80,000, the court rendered judgment in favor of the defendant, non obstante veredicto, from which plaintiff appeals.
The amended complaint, as subsequently amended, consisting of one count, alleges in substance that on and prior to August 3, 1933, the Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Company, defendant, was engaged in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Streeter v. HumrichouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Jeneary v. Chicago & Interurban Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Lerette v. Director General of RailroadsIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Monroe v. Hartford Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Jones v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Ray Schools-Chicago-Inc. v. CumminsIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Universal Airline, Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Katz v. BrooksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Fetterman v. Production Steel Co. of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.