Legal Opinion
Aroa Marketing, Inc. v. Hartford Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 23, 2011No. B228051PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANEELA, J.
INTRODUCTION
Aroa Marketing, Inc. (Aroa), appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend its complaint against respondent Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest (Hartford). In the complaint, Aroa alleged that Hartford had breached its duty to defend or indemnify Aroa in an underlying lawsuit, Radcliffe v. Aroa Marketing, Inc. (Super. Ct. L.A. County, 2008, No. 390531) (Radcliffe lawsuit). The trial court interpreted an insurance contract provision that specifically excluded coverage for “personal and advertising injury” arising out of “any violation of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Tom Waits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Tracy-Locke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Palmer v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. MV TRANSP.California Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Timed Out, LLC v. Youabian, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Alterra Excess & Surplus v. Estate of Buckminster FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Jon Davler, Inc. v. Arch Insurance CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Oglio Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.