Legal Opinion

Alterra Excess & Surplus v. Estate of Buckminster Fuller

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 2015No. A140453PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHMAN, J.

The Estate of Buckminster Fuller (Estate), through its co-executors, appeals from a judgment on the pleadings holding that Alterra Excess and Surplus Insurance Company (Alterra) had no duty to defend, and therefore no duty to indemnify, its insured in an action brought by the Estate against the insured. The basis of the judgment was that an exclusion in the Alterra policy, referred to by all below as the “intellectual property” exclusion, applied to preclude any obligation on the part of Alterra. We reach the same conclusion, and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

General Historical…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
  4. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Tom Waits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Tracy-Locke, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Dept. v. American Alternative Ins. Corp. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Holyoke Mutual Insurance v. Vibram USA, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2016
  5. Kaufman v. Chubb Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API