Legal Opinion

Devore v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 1987No. 85-726PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

In McAdoo v. United States, 515 A.2d 412 (D.C.1986), we held that a defendant’s juvenile adjudications cannot be used *1174to impeach the defendant’s character witnesses on cross-examination. Before us on this appeal is the question whether a character witness may be cross-examined about the wrongful acts of the defendant that underlie the juvenile adjudications. We hold that such acts may be used, subject to the heavy responsibility of the trial court to prevent any abuse.1 We must, however, vacate appellant’s unauthorized use of a motor vehicle conviction as he was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. Bryan Canniff and John BenignoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Rogers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. In re D.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. In Re Ti. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API