Legal Opinion

In Re Ti. B.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 2000No. 00-FS-918, 00-FS-919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

This is a mid-trial appeal in a neglect proceeding. The principal question is whether the trial court abused its discretion in prohibiting appellant T.B. from conferring with his criminal defense counsel about his privilege against self-incrimination, and in barring that counsel from the courtroom while T.B. asserted that privilege. We conclude that the trial court erred. Its rulings, which were not justified by any substantial threat to the integrity or confidentiality of the proceeding, arbitrarily infringed T.B.’s common law and First Amendment right to consult…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. United States v. GouveiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Finkelstein v. Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. In Re Ty. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In Re Public Defender ServiceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Danny B. Ex Rel. Elliott v. RaimondoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. Coulter v. Gerald Family Care, P.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API