Legal Opinion

Krajicek v. Justin

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 27, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-40489PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*876 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

GADOLA, District Judge.

On or about December 4, 1997, plaintiff Constance Krajicek, in pro per, filed the instant action against defendants K.M. Justin, a state district court magistrate, James P. Sheehy, a state district court judge, and Robert Templin and David Breck, state circuit court judges. On December 23, 1997, defendants filed a motion to dismiss asserting that absolute immunity bars all plaintiff’s claims. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion will be granted.

Motion to Dismiss

In considering a motion to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Cleavinger v. SaxnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cain v. Detroit, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  2. DeNoma v. HeekinDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Grant v. WestDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  4. In re: Derrick C. White-ChildsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
  5. Nicole Stargell El Bey v. Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County Juvenile Division, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API