Legal Opinion

DeNoma v. Heekin

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 24, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00470Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Anthony J. Denoma Plaintiff, Case No. 1:20-cv-470 v. Judge Michael R. Barrett Judge Tom Heekin, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s July 28, 2020 Report and Recommendations (“R&R”) (Doc. 6); January 8, 2021 Order and R&R (Doc. 20); and Plaintiff’s Objections to the R&Rs (Docs. 8, 23). Also before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motions for Equitable Tolling (Docs. 26, 27, 28, 30) and Motions for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Docs. 29, 30). I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed a pro se…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API