Legal Opinion

Home State Life Ins. Co. v. Russell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 14, 1936No. 25557PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether a beneficiary of life insurance may enforce payment thereof where the insured has come to his death while committing a felony, the policy containing no express provision either excepting or including such cause of death.

The defendant insurance company issued its policy on the life of Rufus Russell, naming plaintiff as beneficiary. About a month later Rufus Russell was killed by two peace officers while committing the crime of robbery. Beneficiary made due proof of death and was refused payment. The policy’s general provisions were silent as to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weeks v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. Seiler v. Economic Life Ass'n of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Jordan v. Logia Suprema de la Alianza Hispano-AmericanaArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Campbell v. Supreme Conclave Improved Order HeptasophsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  5. Sweetnam v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Freeman v. Crown Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Consumers Life Insurance v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Sanders v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Bird v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API