Legal Opinion

Commercial Shearing & Stamping Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 31, 1972No. 5428, C.A.D. 1067PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Judge.

This appeal is by an American Manufacturer, plaintiff below, and is from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division, 65 Cust. Ct. 91, C.D. 4060, 317 F. Supp. 750 *204(1970), bolding that imported steel plates, pressed to a hemispherical shape, were properly classified by the collector as included in “angles, shapes, and sections,” under item 609.80 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). Appellant claims that the hemispherical items should be classified as other articles of metal which are not more specifically provided for elsewhere in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Application of Thomas L. Jacobs and Ronald S. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Commercial Shearing & Stamping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. A. Johnson & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. Philipp Overseas, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. Philipp Overseas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  4. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API