Legal Opinion

Dunford v. Tryhus

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2009No. 20090178PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jeffrey Dunford appeals the district court’s summary judgment to Dr. Trueman Tryhus, Jr. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in determining Dunford’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

I

[¶ 2] Tryhus practiced dentistry in Fargo from 1958 through 1993. Dunford was born in 1954 and became a patient of Tryhus in the mid-1960s. Dunford alleges Tryhus sexually abused him between 1965 and 1969.

[¶ 3] In 1988, Dunford asked a nonlaw-yer friend in the Fargo area for information regarding the statute of limitations on sexual abuse claims. Dunford was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Iverson v. LancasterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wall v. LewisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Osland v. OslandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bates v. Texas State Technical College, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  5. Green v. Mid Dakota ClinicNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Podrygula v. BrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Larson v. Midland Hospital Supply, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Mertz v. 999 QUEBEC, INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Severance v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Bullinger Enterprises v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API