Mertz v. 999 QUEBEC, INC.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Shirley Mertz (“Mertz”) appealed from a district court order granting summary judgment dismissing her survival action filed on behalf of the estate of her husband, Allen Mertz, seeking to recover damages for alleged asbestos-related injuries from numerous asbestos manufacturers, distributers and sellers (“Defendants”). I would affirm, concluding the discovery rule does not toll the accrual of a survival action beyond the date of the decedent’s death.
I
[¶ 2] Allen Mertz worked as a pipefit-ter for more than thirty years, during which he was allegedly exposed to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Reading Co. v. KoonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- White v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Pastierik v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vicknair v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Olson v. Estate of RustadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Mertz v. 999 QUEBEC, INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Vicknair v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011