Legal Opinion

Mertz v. 999 QUEBEC, INC.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2010No. 20090031PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Shirley Mertz (“Mertz”) appealed from a district court order granting summary judgment dismissing her survival action filed on behalf of the estate of her husband, Allen Mertz, seeking to recover damages for alleged asbestos-related injuries from numerous asbestos manufacturers, distributers and sellers (“Defendants”). I would affirm, concluding the discovery rule does not toll the accrual of a survival action beyond the date of the decedent’s death.

I

[¶ 2] Allen Mertz worked as a pipefit-ter for more than thirty years, during which he was allegedly exposed to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Reading Co. v. KoonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. White v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Pastierik v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vicknair v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Olson v. Estate of RustadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Mertz v. 999 QUEBEC, INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Vicknair v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API