Legal Opinion
Chinese American Restaurant Corp. v. Finigan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 18, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
This is a bill in equity brought to restrain the defendants as representatives of the Boston Musicians’ Protective Association, a voluntary society, from interfering with the employment of the defendant Bittel and his orchestra at the plaintiffs’ place of business. The plaintiff company is a corporation; the plaintiff Bee is its secretary and manager of its restaurant.
*362The plaintiffs allege in what is called an amended and alternative bill that the defendant Samuel Bittel is the leader of an orchestra which has been playing at the plaintiffs’ restaurant ever since its opening on December 29,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Ginn v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Snow v. AlleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Arnold v. MaxwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Whiteside v. BrawleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kidder v. GreenmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Bleck v. East Boston Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Arena v. ErlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Chandler v. LallyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Merchants Discount Co. v. Esther Abelson, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.