Legal Opinion
Chandler v. Lally
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 3, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The allegations of the amended petition are in substance these: The petitioners George F. Chandler and Rose A. Chandler are husband and wife, and the petitioner George F. Chandler, Jr., is their son. The respondent is the administratrix of the estate of Francis Tally, who was the maternal uncle and had been the guardian of George F. Chandler. In 1913 George F. Chandler purchased a business from Tally for $25,000, of which sum Chandler paid $20,000 in cash. He made an assignment, absolute in form, to Tally of Chandler’s interest in the estate of one Blanchard “to secure the payment of” the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dodge v. Anna Jaques HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Somerby v. BuntinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Davis v. CoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Sawyer v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Shea v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Akin v. WarnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Feeney v. FeeneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Garfield v. GarfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Monach v. KoslowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Bodman v. Martha's Vineyard National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.