Legal Opinion
Alaska v. Kerry
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided September 17, 2013No. Case No. 3:12-cv-00142-SLGPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE ALL PENDING MOTIONS
SHARON L. GLEASON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The State of Alaska, later joined by the Resource Development Council for Alaska as a plaintiff-intervenor, initiated this action to challenge the federal enforcement of low-sulfur fuel requirements for marine vessels operating in certain Alaskan coastal waters.
The low-sulfur requirements were implemented pursuant to the United States’ obligations as a party country to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, known as MARPOL. Annex VI of MARPOL designates certain emission control areas…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- South Peninsula Hospital v. Xerox State Healthcare LLCDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2016
- Abbott v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020
- Blakney v. PrasadDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
- Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 341 v. Main Building Maintenance, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2020
- Mothership Fleet Cooperative v. RossDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.