People v. Abraham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SABRAW, J.
The People appeal from an order dismissing several refiled charges against respondent Arthur Rohith Abraham on the ground that trial thereof would violate respondent’s due process right to a speedy trial. The question presented is whether criminal charges that have been dismissed due to the victim’s reluctance to proceed can be reinstituted after the victim is murdered by the accused. We answer this question in the affirmative and therefore reverse the order of dismissal.
Background and Procedure
All of the charges filed against respondent pertain to Mary G., who was the victim…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BoysenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. PinedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. HarvestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. AguileraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020