People v. Harvest
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*645Opinion
HANLON, P. J.
In People v. Hanson (2000) 23 Cal.4th 355 [97 Cal.Rpfr.2d 58, 1 P.3d 650], our Supreme Court held that the double jeopardy provisions of the California Constitution prohibited a trial court from increasing a statutorily mandated restitution fine following retrial after appeal. The issue presented here is whether the same result applies to direct restitution to victims of crime. We conclude that court-ordered victim restitution imposed for the first time at a resentencing following appeal is not punishment and is therefore not constitutionally barred.
Background
Defendant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Correa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001