Legal Opinion
United States v. Time
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 17, 1994No. 93-01300PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. PARKER, District Judge:
Fred Time (“Time”) and Stanley Weinberg (‘Weinberg”) were found in criminal contempt of. court in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 401 and fined. They appealed and their consolidated appeals are now before this Court.
FACTS
Appellants Time and Weinberg served as attorneys for Russell Fagan (Fagan), a defendant in a criminal action tried before United States District Judge Jorge A. Solis. On August 6, 1992, during Fagan’s case-in-chief, Fagan called Gary Jordan (Jordan) to the stand. Jordan had agreed to testify for Fagan, but his testimony apparently surprised Fagan’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. LowderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Thomas J. Sullivan H.J. Sallee, "Mickey"Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.