Legal Opinion

Jarrett v. InterMune Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 30, 2011No. Nos. 10-17237, 10-17239PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Deborah Jane Jarrett et. al., along with third-party payor Government Employees Health Association, Inc., appeal the district court’s dismissal of their proposed nationwide class action suit against InterMune, Inc., Dr. Scott Harkonen, and Genentech, Inc. Because the parties are familiar with the history of. the case, we need not recount it here.

We affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in the district court's orders. See In re Actimmune Marketing Litig., 614 F.Supp.2d 1037 (N.D.Cal.2009) (Actimmune I); In re Actimmune Marketing Litig., No. C 08-02376…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Actimmune Marketing LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  2. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  3. Pat District Council 82 v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Wilson v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API